Comments for New ArmA 2 footage revealed |
|
|
|
|
d@nte |
|
|
November 13th, 2008 - 14:38 |
|
i'm happy to see some female civilians, even if the animations seem robotic (even for the soldiers)
|
|
But hopefully team will work more on realism than on eyecandy. Proper ballistics and damage system and we might overlook sucky gfx ;)
|
|
I guess I better buy a new machine......lol......
|
|
Personally, I don't care whether they have destruction in the replacement sense or full fledged physics like in Crysis. But yeah they should add more smoke to hide the replacements. This game looks fantastic even tho the biggest difference in the sequel might be the graphics. But hey, visuals make it more realistic and immersive so that is a plus in any book. Certainly a refreshing change from Arma1.
There are plenty of games out there which have tons of sequels which barely change the gameplay experience and only improve on graphics.
|
|
I totally agree IceBreakr! Well said.
|
|
Destruction simulation of the house would look cool like few years ago. Where is the smoke, what is this crappy replace_model animation of the house? It just looks awful in current WIP state, authors should check Crysis or at least Far Cry2 physics when things go kaboom ;)
|
|
I think the people walking around looked "robotic." It seems the game plays the same as ArmA so other than graphics, not all that impressive as far as I'm concerned. One thought would be awesome is what doomek hinted on.... Driving tanks through simple structures...
|
|
|
|
DaKa |
|
|
November 12th, 2008 - 19:55 |
|
Beautiful... that is all I can say... It is like a diamond... a raw one... but still...
|
|
|
|
Doomek |
|
|
November 12th, 2008 - 16:07 |
|
Regarding the destruction so it took me a very ... Nevertheless it's a big difference compared to Arma 1. Still could try to start the tank against the house. I would be a total of curious what will happen.
|
|
This game is set to be a classic as far as I can see
|