Comments for SOTW 2009 - Week 49 |
|
|
|
|
vilas |
|
|
December 14th, 2009 - 07:47 |
|
i simply asked whom he call trouble maker
"I'd rather avoid another round with troublemakers"
????
i asked whom he call troublemaker and my post was deleted as flame ?
concerning picture itself - Topas is great screenshot maker, but i not focus on it, i wrote here after i saw "troublemaker" name
|
|
|
|
Rewan |
|
|
December 13th, 2009 - 20:30 |
|
Don't misunderstand me, I don't want to have telling Cervo we have to close the comments here because there is flamebait at each corner.
About the situation, I know it perfectly but it have still strictly NOTHING to do in here. We got a forum, use it. I'll even be kind and links you to the request/suggestion thread => HERE
Case closed. Now stay for good on the topic which is the picture itself and not really what units are in.
|
|
|
|
topas |
|
|
December 13th, 2009 - 13:15 |
|
@Icewind.123
What you describe has really occured but It was not me to choose this screen for SOTW.. And it has been chosen already after the whole issue has been cleared with the administration.. So it's not me breaking the rules and posting again what I am not supposed to.. Someone who chosen the screen must have been unaware of the 'inside story'...
And I did commented on this; having doubts as to the logic of such actions; I made a statement not to show screens including the 'controversial' content; and few days afterwards someone else does..
Which ends of course in me being slandered in public again;
Have this SOTW deleted maybe......
|
|
YEAH!!! Polska do boju!!! Very nice screenshot!
|
|
Rewan, I don't think you fully understand the situation. Before you call my post also OT, go on read it through.
In short:
1. Topas reskins Vilas work. 2. Topas posts pictures of this in screenshot threads and sends the data to one person, while getting requests by other members. 3. Vilas doesn't like that, which was also indicated by his (deleted) post here.
4. Topas pictures in the combat thread featering edited textures get deleted, quoting Wittmann:
"Until advised otherwise no images featuring retextures of Vilas' work are to be posted here unless he has given permission for any such work to be distributed."
5. One of the controversial screenshots probably featuring Vilas work gets chosen for SOTW and Topas admitts at post 3 at page 2 of the comment page of this screenshot that he was using edited work of Vilas for this screenshot:
"But is it OK, to make a SOTW out of a shot featuring content being the reason for the recent mess in CPthread"
So, you are fine with posting screenshots featuring edited content as SOTW when the original author doesn't approve and Wittmann clearly states this was not ok? I would rather call that injustice.
Vilas may have commented in an emotional "agressive" way, but that doesn't justify his rights being cut of.
|
|
|
|
fX8 |
|
|
December 12th, 2009 - 23:46 |
|
wow. Great just great!
|
|
|
|
Rewan |
|
|
December 12th, 2009 - 22:50 |
|
Vilas comment deleted for being a obvious attempt to flame-bait.
Stay on the topic ladies and keep the OT for the right section on our forums ;-)
Anyways, good picture :-)
|
|
|
|
sabre |
|
|
December 11th, 2009 - 11:25 |
|
save it for PM's.
Cool screen though mate.
|
|
this is epic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 10th, 2009 - 15:42 |
|
Good work matey
|