| Comments for ArmA Patch 1.12 released |
|
|
|
lol dex, pwned tcm :D
|
|
|
awwww isn't that just the cutest post you have ever read??? <sniffles>
TCM
|
| |
 |
|
Dex |
|
|
| April 5th, 2008 - 22:28 |
|
Dear Trash Can Man,
thank you for your precise Analysis.
I am always happy when u provide me with the most interesting and read-worthy sight of Things. It should be considered an Honor having you as an Asset in this Community. You have made it yet another time to occupy my thinking with your brilliant Reasoning. I hope we all can enjoy you in the Future.
Sincerely yours,
Dex
|
|
|
oh look, yet another patch.... Will the fun ever end?!?!?!
|
| |
|
|
Dj!NN? |
|
|
| April 5th, 2008 - 01:23 |
|
Guys, I'd only just installed 1.11 yesterday, before realising that there was a new 1.12 patch release. I instantly noticed the difference in 1.11 and the game played great for 7 hours on a great server, no lag. The server admin came on and told us 1.12 was out and reset to patch up. I went and dl-ed as well. Now to my point.
The game played ok for about 3-4 hours, and then I started getting odd lag. I thought it may be my router, so dc-ed/reset/reconnnected. I started to get an odd bug where I'd load in the map and ppl said I had a 'memory error' and the towns we had captured were not done on my map, even though they were done on server. I had to dc/rc again. then players started to 'disapear' from my vision as I changed from 1st to 3rd view, as in become invisible, although their name would appear whenever I targeted their location. My ping during this stage was a nice 60-70.
Now I don;t know if this is a common problem, and being new to the beta patches I may have an other problem that has nothing to do with Beta, but just in case I thought I'd mention. If anyone else is having newfound problems with 1.12 please post here. Thanks.
P.S Thanks guys for all the work on patching. I for one, despite many of the bugs love this game, and don't want it to die. OFP had/still has one of the most loyal fanbases. Don't be ungrateful guys. I'm sure the guys at BIS are just as pissed with the bugs as we are and I don't think they meant it to happen this way. Peace.
|
|
|
after beta it s gold ;o). Alpha is before beta
|
|
|
|
Would you rather have a beta patch that changes things with each newer version or a final one with almost no testing that breaks more than it fixes?
I guess it is not possible to expect good work for our money?! We wait more than a year...
There are still game developers that bring out games with only view bugs and patch them in a month or two.
Alpha (or Beta) Assault from BIS not belong to them...
|
| |
 |
|
Bence |
|
|
| April 4th, 2008 - 21:13 |
|
ungreatful? with good reason! :|
|
|
|
Quit your bitching. Would you rather have a beta patch that changes things with each newer version or a final one with almost no testing that breaks more than it fixes? You lot whine no matter what. I'm surprised they're still even supporting this ungreatful community.
|
|
|
Ok! More batatesting... When we do this and write error reports i guess BIS owe us money for the hard work.
But hey - with each beta ArmA becomes cheaper I suppose. :)
|
0%
Arma Tactics released for PC via Steam.
A new home of sorts for
